Skip to main content


Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope


Clinical Articles

In May 2019, The Journal of Urology published An Algorithmic Approach to Implementation of a Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Results in a Decrease in Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Repair Costs.
In May 2018, The Journal of Urology published Cost Analysis of Utilization of Disposable Flexible Ureteroscopes in High Risk for Breakage Cases.

In March 2018, The Journal of Endourology published Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
In March 2018, The Journal of Endourology published In Vitro Evaluation Comparing LithoVue to a Pusen Single-Use Ureteroscope and a Karl Storz Reusable Scope.

In January 2018, the journal Urolithiasis published an analysis of reusable scopes vs. LithoVue in an economic comparison.
In December 2017, OR Manager published an article about the need for greater vigilance to combat ureteroscope contamination.

In September 2017, The Journal of Endourology published Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Versus Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopy Use.
In September 2017, The Journal of Endourology published Current Disposable Ureteroscopes–Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.

In June 2017, the American Journal of Infection Control published The Effectiveness of Sterilization for Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Real-World Study.
In January/February 2017, Communique, a publication of the International Association of Healthcare Central Service Material Management, published A Glimpse at the True Cost of Reprocessing Endoscopes: Results of a Pilot Project.

In June 2016, The Journal of Endourology published Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Explore the features and benefits of the LithoVue™ Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope.