Skip to main content
AGENT Drug-Coated Balloon

MODERN PCI - Treat

Why Drug-Coated Balloons (DCBs)

Effectively treat ISR with Coronary DCBs

Current treatment options for in-stent restenosis (ISR) can be challenging. There is a demand for enhanced therapies that avoid additional metal layers, reduce the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and provide better long-term outcomes for patients. Drug-coated balloons are an effective and globally recognized treatment option for ISR, supported by extensive clinical evidence, offering superior outcomes compared to repeat stenting.  

Expanding ISR options

Approximately 10% of PCIs are performed to treat ISR.1 Current treatment options for ISR include layering of additional stents, balloon angioplasty or radiation, all of which introduce potential risks for patients. Additional options enable physicians to find a trusted treatment for every lesion. 

Therapy improvements needed for ISR patients

  • Enable future treatment options
  • Avoid several layers of metal
  • Reduce the need for prolonged DAPT2

ISR remains the leading cause of repeat PCI in the U.S.3

82%

Currently 82% of patients with ISR receive another stent1, which is associated with a higher risk of target lesion revascularization.4

Repeat intervention associated with higher risk of target revascularization (TLR)4

Repeat intervention chart

DCBs provide a new option for PCI

Drug design

Targeted antiproliferative drug delivery designed to reduce the rate of restenosis without introducing an additional metallic layer.

Anticipated benefits

Avoids additional layers of metal

  • Reducing potential complication, including fracture, malapposition, and thrombosis5

May enable future treatment options

  • For lifetime patient management by leaving no metal behind

May reduce duration of DAPT

  • May result in reduced rate of medication-related bleeding complications6

Proven ISR treatment

Drug-coated balloons are an effective and proven ISR treatment with an established global footprint.

World icon

1M+

patients treated with DCBs worldwide7

Person icon

100,000+

patients treated with AGENT DCB7

World icon

3,400+

patients evaluated across 16 studies comparing DCB vs. DES in ISR7


Paclitaxel DCB vs. repeat stenting for recurrent ISR

Statistically superior MACE-free survival rate with DCB at 1 year.

Study flow8

Chart

MACE-free survival8

Chart

Primary endpoint: MACE—a composite CV death, nonfatal MI, ischemia-driven TLR, and stent thrombosis at 1 year.


Global DCB clinical practice guidelines

DCBs are a global standard of care for patients with ISR. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in ISR with its highest possible evidence class: 1A.9

2020 DCB Consensus Group recommendations:

"Randomized controlled trial data show that the DCB technique with optimal lesion preparation, functional testing, use of antiproliferative drugs to inhibit intimal hyperplasia, and short-term DAPT has become a valid option for the treatment of coronary artery disease in many clinical situations."10

Talk to a rep

Fill out a short form and one of our sales representatives will be in touch with you.

Receive updates

Stay informed on the latest advancements in DCBs and Drug-Eluting Stents (DES).

References:

1. Moussa ID, Mohananey D, Saucedo J, et al. Trends and outcomes of restenosis after coronary stent implantation in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1521–1531.

2. Alfonso F, Coughlan J, Giacoppo D, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Management of in-stent restenosis. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2022;18(2):e103–e123.

3. Stolker JM, Cohen DJ, Kennedy KF, et al. Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) Investigators. Repeat revascularization after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an evaluation of staged, target lesion, and other unplanned revascularization procedures during the first year. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):772–782.

4. Kastrati A, Cassese S. In-stent restenosis in the United States: time to enrich its treatment armamentarium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(13):1532–1535.

5. Siontis GCM, Stefanini GG, Mavridis D, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in stent restenosis: a network meta analysis. Lancet. 2015;386(9994):655–664.

6. Alfonso F, Coughlan J, Giacoppo D, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Management of in-stent restenosis. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2022;18(2):e103–e123.

7. Market Data on file at BSC as of July 2023.

8. Wang G, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting balloon with repeat drug-eluting stent for recurrent drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis. Coron Artery Dis. 2019;30(7):473–480.

9. Yerasi C, Case BC, Forrestal BJ, Torguson R, Weintraub WS, Garcia-Garcia HM, Waksman R. Drug-coated balloon for de novo coronary artery disease: JACC state‑of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1061–1073.

10. Jeger R, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2020;13(12):1391–1402.