Study Methodology & Analysis


  • DFR values were compared to iFR values using the 893 waveform tracings from the 833 patients pooled from the VERIFY 2 and CONTRAST studies
  • The DFR window uses two criteria: Pa < mean Pa and down-sloping Pa
  • No ECG signal were required
  • No need to identify dicrotic notch

 

Intermediate Lesion1

DFR: 0.90 | iFR: 0.90
Intermediate Lesion

Severe Lesion1

DFR: 0.71 | iFR: 0.71
Severe Lesion
 

 

VERIFY 2 + CONTRAST Pooled Analysis: DFR Showed Equivalency to iFR

VERIFY 2 + CONTRAST Pooled Analysis: DFR Showed Equivalency to iFR

VERIFY 2 Analysis: DFR is within the Intra-iFR Variation of ~0.01

Two iFR Measurements Taken Directly After Each Other
 
 
 

 
  • Greater divergence of the curves demonstrates better prognostic ability
  • There was no statistically significant difference in prognostic performance among any of the NHPRs
 

 
Class Effect Among Resting Indices
 

 
 

 

Learn how to optimize your approach with IVUS and the POLARIS Multi-Modality Guidance System.

See the broadest portfolio of dependable, sophisticated PCI devices.

Get exclusive product updates, training and educational opportunities, and more. 

Fill out a quick form and one of our sales representatives will be in touch. 
Top