Disclaimer

For health care professionals in EUROPE excepted those practicing in France as the following pages are intended to all International health care professionals and are not in compliance with the French Advertising law N°2011-2012 dated 29th December 2011 article 34. Other health care professionals should select their country in the top right corner of the  website.

Please note that the following pages are exclusively reserved for health care professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations. To the extent this site contains information, reference guides and databases intended for use by licensed medical professionals, such materials are not intended to offer professional medical advice. Prior to use, please consult device labeling for prescriptive information and operating instructions.

This Website is protected by the laws on copyright and by the relevant international conventions. It is strictly forbidden to make copies, whether partial or total and on whichever media without prior approval.

Ranger banner image

RANGER DCB VS. PTA

RANGER II SFA clinical trial results

RANGER II SFA pivotal trial

Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial Ranger Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Uncoated Balloon (3:1). Follow-up through 5-Years.1

Ranger DCB demonstrated exceptional outcomes at 2-Years.

No matter the lesion complexity. No matter the patient.

 

Ranger demonstrated the highest ever reported 2-Year Kaplan-Meier primary patency for a DCB in an RCT.

Chart of Ranger DCB Kaplan-Meier Primary Patency Results

*Log-rank p-value compares the entire K-M curves from time point zero to day 760 (full 2-year follow-up window)

1. RANGER II SFA RCT 2-Year Results presented by Ravish Sachar, MD. VIVA 2021.

2-year subgroup analysis

Ranger DCB delivered exceptional outcomes in complex lesions at 2-Years.

Ranger DCB demonstrated low reintervention rates regardless of patient gender.

Bar chart showing Ranger DCB vs PTA
Bar chart showing 67% relative reduction of CD-TLR for Ranger DCB vs PTA

  *  PACSS Grade 3/4 Calcification

**  Log-rank p-value compares the entire K-M curves from time point zero to day 760 (full 2-year follow-up window)

*** Log-rank p-value compares the entire K-M curves from time point zero to day 730 (full 2-year annual visit mark)

RANGER II SFA PK sub study²

Infographic of Ranger study showing in 1 hour 11 out of 12 patients did not have measurable levels of paclitaxel in the bloodstream

2. The limit of quantification was defined as < 1 ng/mL. RANGER II SFA PK Substudy. RANGER II SFA RCT 1-Year Results published in JACC:CI. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.021.

Ranger II SFA pivotal trial details

  Ranger DCB
(n=207)
PTA
(n=98)
p-value
Primary safety endpoint
(Freedom from MAE)
94.1%
(241/256)
83.0%
(76/91)
P non-inferiority
‹0.0001
Primary effectiveness endpoint
(Binary primary patency)
82.9%
(194/234)
66.3%
(57/86)
0.0017
  Ranger DCB
(n=278)
PTA
(n=98)
p-value
Age (year) 70.6 69.1 0.1887
Women 37.8% 31.6% 0.2769
Smoking history     0.0303
Current/previous 31.3% / 54.0% 45.9% / 38.8% N/A
Never/unknown 14.4% / 0.4% 15.3% / 0.0% N/A
Diabetes mellitus 42.4% 43.9% 0.8055
Lesion length (mm) 82.5 79.9 0.655
Moderate calcium (PACSS grade 3) 36.3% 52.0% 0.006
Severe valcium (PACSS grade 4) 11.5% 10.2% 0.724
100% (occlusion) 18.3% 29.6% 0.019

  Ranger DCB
(n=278)
PTA
(n=98)
p-value
CD-TLR 5.5% 16.5% 0.0011
K-M all-cause mortality 1.9% 2.1% 0.8794
  Ranger DCB
(n=278)
PTA
(n=98)
p-value
K-M freedom from TLR 87.4% 79.5% 0.0316*
Mod/Sev calcium subgroup K-M freedom from TLR 90.9% 79.6% 0.0246*
CTO subgroup K-M freedom from TLR 85.6% 62.8% 0.0172*
All-cause mortality 5.7% 3.2% 0.4218

  * Log-rank p-value compares the entire K-M curves from time point zero to day 730 (full 2-year annual visit mark)

Primary safety endpoint: composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days and freedom from major target limb amputation and CD-TLR through 1-Year post index-procedure.

Primary efficacy endpoint: primary patency at 1-Year defined as absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) or binary restenosis determined as a peak systolic velocity ratio > 2.4 evaluated by duplex ultrasound core laboratory analysis.

CD-TLR: a reintervention performed for ≥ 50% diameter stenosis (confirmed by angiography) within ± 5 mm proximal and/or distal to the target lesion after documentation of recurrent clinical symptoms of PAD (increase of 1 Rutherford class or more) and/or drop of ABI (≥20% or >0.15 when compared to maximum early post-procedural level).


Ordering and reimbursement

Get downloads for ordering information and reimbursement coding guides for our drug-eluting technologies.

Stay up to date

Receive emails about the latest drug-eluting technology news, innovations and events in your area.

Caution:
The law restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician. Indications, contraindications, warnings, and instructions for use can be found in the product labelling supplied with each device or at www.IFU-BSCI.com. Products shown for INFORMATION purposes only and may not be approved or for sale in certain countries. This material not intended for use in France.